Single Step Tableaux for Modal Logics Computational Properties, Complexity and Methodology
نویسنده
چکیده
Single Step Tableaux (SST) are the basis of a calculus for modal logics that combines different features of sequent and prefixed tableaux into a simple, modular, strongly analytic, and effective calculus for a wide range of modal logics. The paper presents a number of the computational results about SST (confluence, decidability, space complexity, modularity, etc.) and compares SST with other formalisms such as translation methods, modal resolution, and Gentzen-type tableaux. For instance, it discusses the feasibility and infeasibility of deriving decision procedures for SST and translation-based methods by replacing loop checking techniques with simpler termination checks. The complexity of searching for validity and logical consequence with SST and other methods is discussed. Minimal conditions on SST search strategies are proven to yield PSPACE (and NPTIME for S5 and KD45) decision procedures. The paper also presents the methodology underlying the construction of the correctness and completeness proofs.
منابع مشابه
A Uniform Tableaux Method for Nonmonotonic Modal Logics
We present a semantic tableaux calculus for propositional nonmonotonic modal logics, based on possible-worlds characterisations for nonmonotonic modal logics. This method is parametric with respect to both the modal logic and the preference semantics, since it handles in a uniform way the entailment problem for a wide class of nonmonotonic modal logics: McDermott and Doyle's logics and ground l...
متن کاملOn the Relative Complexity of Labelled Modal Tableaux
The relative computational complexity of two free-variable labelled modal tableaux (KEM and Single Step Tableaux, SST) is investigated. We discuss the reasons why p-simulation is not a proper measure to compare tableaux-like proof systems, and we propose an improved comparison scale (p-search-simulation). It shown that KEM p-search-simulates SST while SST cannot p-search-simulate KEM.
متن کاملK-clusters Tableaux a Tool for Modal Logics and Inconsistent Belief Sets
The goal of this paper is to present a tableau calculus for propositional modal logics that is e ective for automated proof search, easy to use for proof presentation, and applicable to a wide range of modal logics for knowledge representation. The calculus is also enhanced to provide a form of contextual reasoning to deal with (classical) inconsistency. The basic tableau calculus (Single Step ...
متن کاملOptimal Tableaux for Conditional Logics with Cautious Monotonicity
Conditional logics capture default entailment in a modal framework in which non-monotonic implication is a first-class citizen, and in particular can be negated and nested. There is a wide range of axiomatizations of conditionals in the literature, from weak systems such as the basic conditional logic CK, which allows only for equivalent exchange of conditional antecedents, to strong systems su...
متن کاملComplexity of Simple Dependent Bimodal Logics
We characterize the computational complexity of simple dependent bimodal logics. We define an operator ⊕⊆ between logics that almost behaves as the standard joint operator ⊕ except that the inclusion axiom [2]p ⇒ [1]p is added. Many multimodal logics from the literature are of this form or contain such fragments. For the standard modal logics K,T ,B,S4 and S5 we study the complexity of the sati...
متن کامل